Please visit the other 'Bricks' blogs:
ArtisticBricks ComicBricks ContestBricks DisneyBricks GodBricks
MicroBricks MinilandBricks SciBricks TolkienBricks VignetteBricks

Wednesday, April 29, 2009

The end of the world as we know it, but I feel fine

Note: In this and future posts on the Brick Testament I'll probably include a lot of my own opinion and not just straight reportage. I'm a huge fan of Brendan's work, but I also come at the source material from a different religious view, so disagree with him at times. Back when I was active on Lugnet I'd post my thoughts on both the LEGO building and the religious interpretation for each new installment, so I'll do that here. Hopefully I can get Brendan to respond as well to start a dialog in this forum.

Apocalyptic literature became an important part of both Jewish and Christian traditions from around 500 BC to 300 AD. These groups were facing trying times - the nation of Israel was destroyed by outside forces and many of the people were in exile in the Babylonian captivity, and even after they returned to their homeland they faced incursions by the Greeks and the Romans. In the first few centuries of Christianity the followers of this new faith faced many persecutions. These people found comfort in apocalyptic literature. The word "apocalypse" comes from the Greek for removing a veil. This literature told them that, yes, times were bad and would get much worse, but there was some ultimate triumph in which the righteous would be saved and things would be much better (messianic era or heavenly reward for the two traditions, respectively). Examples of this literature can be found in places like the book of Daniel or in various extra-canonical works, but the most well-known apocalypse is the book of Revelation, found at the end of the Christian Bible. This book is full of allegory and fantastic imagery, and Brendan Powell Smith has taken on the challenge of illustrating these in the latest installment of the Brick Testament.

Brendan illustrates the introduction to the book in Future Revealed to Guy on Tiny Mediterranean Island.



LEGO thoughts: Probably the best achievement in LEGO building here is the image shown above, with John coming ashore and a microscale building and ship in the background in soft focus to give a sense of perspective. I also really like how he did the Son of Man and the seven lampstands-a good realization of the poetic language there. To me the first few images, where the Father tells the Son tells an angel tells John seemed a little redundant and wasteful - there may have been a more efficient way to accomplish the same thing in a tighter fashion. I also disliked how in a couple of images Brendan removed the minifig's head from his body to try to make it look like he was bending at the neck (minifigs have very limited poses in some ways) - elsewhere in the BT Brendan does this with figs who are dead, so here it looks to me more like John has a broken neck.

Interpretation thoughts: One interpretive quibble - Brendan implies that John chose to go to Patmos on an evangelistic mission. Most people think he was exiled there in persecution for preaching about Christ. I realize, though, that either of these is a fair interpretation of the bare phrase that John was there "because of the word of God and the testimony about Jesus" without any extra-biblical tradition.

The next section of Revelation contains the letters to the seven churches of Asia Minor, in which Christ rebukes them for their failings and promises rewards for their faithfulness. Brendan illustrates these in Children to be Killed as Warning.



LEGO thoughts: Good choice of figures here, especially for Jezebel and the other woman. Using doors as a table works well, as do other details in the building interiors. One thing that I feel doesn't work is the image where red dots were Photoshopped in as some sort of disease - I always prefer true LEGO solutions to this sort of thing. I also feel that there were some missed opportunities here. Most of the promises of reward were ignored (more below), but the faithful being given white robes, a stone, food, etc. might have made good LEGO illustrations. I could also see some humorous possibilities in giving each a new name, being made a pillar in the temple of God, or in the faithful sitting with Jesus on his throne as he with the Father (I could imagine the Christian sitting on Christ's lap who was on the Father's lap). Another passage that might have been fun to illustrate is Christ saying to the church at Laodicea that he would spew them out of his mouth.

Interpretation thoughts: I do think that some of Brendan's bias peeks through here. I believe (and I would love his feedback on this) that he feels that the God of the Bible is wrathful and capricious, and Christians need to confront this aspect of his character. As such Brendan tends to illustrate those passages with punishments or slaughters with great enthusiasm (e.g. his illustrations of the conquest of the Promised Land in Joshua and some of the tribulations in Revelation, below), but not passages showing reward. So the focus of this section of the BT is a very literal interpretation of Jezebel and her promised punishment, rather than noting how these seven churches each have their negatives and positives and God's rebuke to the former and encouragement of the latter.

In the next section of the book, John is taken up in a vision, as illustrated in Heaven Revealed. Even Christians who have not studied Revelation would recognize this section as it is the basis for much of the lyrics of the hymn Holy, Holy, Holy.



LEGO thoughts: The real tour de force here is the scene where all of the creatures of land and sea praise the Lord, especially the illusion of the boat floating on top of the sea and the shark, fish and diver swimming underwater. I also really like the door in the sky, the choir of angels, and the saints casting down their golden crowns upon the glassy sea. The real failing here is the depiction of the four beasts with multiple eyes and the Lamb that was slain. I don't think these measure up to how other creatures are depicted in the BT (though doors as wings on the eagle is a good idea).

The Lamb goes on to open the seven seals upon the scroll in three stories: God Tortures, Kills Billions, Terrorized Humans Wish for Death and 144,000 Jews Saved.





LEGO thoughts: The first story has a good interpretation of the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse. I was kind of disappointed we didn't get a group photo of them, perhaps flying through the sky down toward the earth. Death on his pale horse may be my favorite - that skeletal horse is such a perfect element. Other nice build elements include the scales and the famished figs (I'm going to have to borrow that idea). Some good humor with the wild animals - landshark and switchblade monkey, especially.
The second story is largely perfect. I actually thought the Statue of Liberty, which Brendan used as his thumbnail, was the weakest of these. Very ingenious with the sky rolled up like a scroll (Brendan uses a poster for his background sky, so here he just rolls it up) and I really love the falling stars and the earthquake scene. The rockscaping in the hiding place is also great, though perhaps the ground shouldn't just be a flat baseplate.
The third story makes use of a LEGO built-globe. There have been variations on this idea in the past, but this one is very well done. In the group shot of the Jews there is one guy in the second row with a beard and black hat that is just perfect for a Hasid.

Interpretation thoughts: Not to sound like a broken record, but again I perceive a bias here, with the image of a capricious God who just decides to torture and kill billions of people for fun. For instance, the setting aside of a fraction of the Jews looks like a concentration camp, with people being branded with hot irons, rather than saving them from destruction. As I mentioned above, apocalyptic literature is written to people who are undergoing great persecution. It is ultimately for them a comfort rather than a horror movie. That said, as a LEGO builder I always enjoy some plastic destruction, so maybe I should be generous and say that Brendan enjoys building these sorts of things more than everyone sitting around singing praises.

Finally for now, the opening seventh seal brings seven angels to blow their trumpets in God Burns One Third of Earth and God Poisons Humans, Sealife. This gets us to the end of Revelation 8, so the next trumpets will pick up in the next installment of the BT.




LEGO thoughts: The first story has a couple of particularly effective images. "Crashes of thunder, flashes of lightning, and an earthquake" is well done, with an innovative way to make lightning - much nicer than his earlier solution. Most striking, though, is the picture of the burned earth. Oh, the golden censer filled with fire is also well done.
The second story also has some nice build details. I'm a little torn on the splash, but really like how he did angels knocking out the sun, moon and stars. As always, his interiors are great, with the people dying of bitter water (note the blue plume used as spilled water). My favorite may be the microscale cruise ship sinking - I'm a sucker for microscale. The one real fail here is the giant star Wormwood.

Interpretation thoughts: Pretty much the same as the last set of stories, so I won't repeat myself.

4 comments:

  1. Hi, Bruce. First let me say that it's nice to once again have your detailed comments on my latest updates. For any readers interested in Bruce's many previous comments on Brick Testament updates from when he was active on LUGNET.com, here's a pointer to them.

    > These people found comfort in apocalyptic
    > literature...This literature told them that,
    > yes, times were bad and would get much worse,
    > but there was some ultimate triumph in which
    > the righteous would be saved and things
    > would be much better

    I've heard this sentiment expressed by several other religious folks, and it seems to have become the party line for morally justifying what would otherwise be seen more plainly as a moral outrage of the worst kind. And as justifications go, I think it utterly fails.

    First there's the question of whether your statement's presumptions are true. I am willing to set aside debate over whether there actually was a persecution of Christians going on at the time when the Revelation of John was written. But to characterize the Revelation of John's (or other contemporary Jewish and Christian apocalyptic writings') main message as being "the righteous will be rewarded" seems terribly myopic. I invite you to reread Revelation and keep close track of how much text is devoted to describing the rewards of the righteous vs. how much text is devoted to describing the tortures of all those the author considers non-righteous.

    Apocalyptic literature may indeed be comforting to some, but these are the sorts of people who are comforted by grisly descriptions of the tortures of their perceived enemies. As a thought experiment: imagine a homosexual man in a German WWII concentration camp. He pens a short book, 95% of which is devoted to describing the calamaties that the Twin Gay Gods of the Universe are soon going to unleash on the world, and disturbing descriptions of the eternal torure of not merely the Nazis, the Nazi-sympathizers, the Allied nations who didn't act fast enough, but everyone who ever lived on Earth except for 144,000 men who have never been "defiled by women". In passing, he mentions that these "righteous" gay men will spend eternity in gay heaven paying homage to the Gay Gods. The question is: does persecution morally justify looking forward to the eternal torture of others? Is it morally good to find comfort in the thought that most people who ever lived will suffer torture for all eternity?

    > the first few images, where the Father
    > tells the Son tells an angel tells John
    > seemed a little redundant and wasteful -
    > there may have been a more efficient way
    > to accomplish the same thing in a tighter
    > fashion

    The point of illustrating it this way was to highlight the strange game of Telephone going on here. God has a ridiculously important message for humanity and presumably an infinite number of ways to convey that message. Does he broadcast it to all of humanity in their own language in a way that is undeniably from God? No. He tells it to Jesus, Jesus tells it to an angel, and an angel tells it to an otherwise-unknown-to-history guy on a tiny Mediterranean island somewhere around the year 90 AD.

    > Most people think he was exiled there in
    > persecution for preaching about Christ. I
    > realize, though, that either of these is a
    > fair interpretation of the bare phrase that
    > John was there "because of the word of God
    > and the testimony about Jesus" without any
    > extra-biblical tradition.

    I looked into the tradition that he was there as an exile and found nothing to support it besides tradition itself. I came to the same conclusion about the tradition that the John in Revelation is the apostle John of the gospels.

    > I do think that some of Brendan's bias peeks
    > through here. I believe (and I would love his
    > feedback on this) that he feels that the God
    > of the Bible is wrathful and capricious, and
    > Christians need to confront this aspect of his
    > character. As such Brendan tends to illustrate
    > those passages with punishments or slaughters
    > with great enthusiasm (e.g. his illustrations
    > of the conquest of the Promised Land in Joshua
    > and some of the tribulations in Revelation,
    > below), but not passages showing reward.

    I don't deny certain biases concerning what Bible material I choose to illustrate, but I consider my biases a tiny counterweight attempting to balance out what I percieve as an opposing bias held by countless other Bible story illustrators and retellers over the ages. I also consider my biases less egregious and overall far less significant. To put it in over-simplified terms, one might charge that I "only highlight X percent of the Bible in an attempt to make it look bad" while my feeling is that everyone else "only highlights Y percent of the Bible to make it look good". But with 399 Bible stories and 4,302 illustrations so far, it is my hope that people are beginning to see that X is very large, growing, and will likely reach 90-95% while Y seems to stay around 5%.

    The other consideration for me is: I got the idea as a child that the Bible is God's word; his one sure message to all humanity and our best moral guide. I took that on faith as a kid and didn't consider it necessary to read it for myself to see if it truly was as divinely good a book as it was made out to be. But when your expectations for a book are that high, all it really takes is one example to shatter that idea. Simply put, any book that claims to be a possible best moral guide can be discredited by being shown to make even a single immoral claim. If it makes hundreds of immoral pronouncements while at the same time passing them off as the height of morality, it becomes quite dangerous--that is, if anyone believes in it and takes it seriously.

    When I read the Bible, which is by far the most violent book I have ever read, I feel compassion for the victims of its endless string of cruel and violent acts. It is all the more troubling to me that these victims are generally portrayed as the "bad guys" in Bible stories (or merely worthless and not worthy of sympathy) while the ones carrying out the cruel and violent acts are portrayed as the "good guys" from Moses and Joshua on up to Jesus and Yahweh. So my bias is to illustrate the Bible's countless instances of immoral cruelty and violence with a sympathy for the victims in hopes that it will awaken similar feelings of compassion in the viewer and cause them to question whether the "good guys" are really good at all in these stories.

    > The real tour de force here is the scene
    > where all of the creatures of land and sea
    > praise the Lord...The real failing here is
    > the depiction of the four beasts with
    > multiple eyes and the Lamb that was slain.
    > I don't think these measure up to how other
    > creatures are depicted in the BT

    Glad you liked the All Creatures Praise God scene. That was fun and very time-consuming to set up. I was glad to have found purely LEGO solutions for everything in that illustration--not having to resort to Photoshop for anything. On a theological level, it strikes the reader as a bit odd that for a brief moment every creature on Earth praises God "for ever and ever", and then this is immediately followed by God's sending wave after wave of torment upon all these people and creatures who just praised him. Did he find them too insincere? Had God make them all praise him like zombies? Or is he really that entirely capricious and wrathful? (Or is this some terrible writing by the author of Revelation?)

    Sorry you didn't care for the four "living creatures" covered in eyes and the slain lamb. I was very pleased with how these turned out. You don't really say what it is about them you don't like. Is it the scale? I invite suggestions for how to fashion a LEGO creature "covered in eyes" at a smaller scale, or how to fit seven eyes and seven horns on the lamb at a smaller scale. Actually, I didn't scale the lamb up to that height until I'd designed the scroll with the seven seals, which turned out to be quite large in order to accomodate all those seals and still resemble a scroll.

    > The first story has a good interpretation
    > of the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse. I was
    > kind of disappointed we didn't get a group
    > photo of them, perhaps flying through the sky
    > down toward the earth.

    I was also disappointed that the text didn't really allow for such an illustration. To make up for this, I created a desktop wallpaper of the Four Horsemen in all their glory.

    > again I perceive a bias here, with the image
    > of a capricious God who just decides to torture
    > and kill billions of people for fun. For
    > instance, the setting aside of a fraction of
    > the Jews looks like a concentration camp, with
    > people being branded with hot irons, rather
    > than saving them from destruction.

    I guess we'd have to ask some Holocaust survivors to know for certain, but I imagine the idea of rounding up 144,000 Jews to mark them as Jews might conjure up some less-then-pleasing thoughts and images, especially coming from a the holy book of a religion which is based on the idea that the Jews have fundementally misunderstood their own holy scriptures.

    And isn't the idea of a God who "saves" 144,000 male, virgin Jews (maleness and virginity status specified in Revelation 14:4 which I have yet to illustrate) while sending waves of torments against everyone else, and comdemning all other humans who ever lived to eternal torure a decent definition of a "wrathful and capricious God"?

    > My favorite may be the microscale cruise
    > ship sinking - I'm a sucker for microscale.
    > The one real fail here is the giant star
    > Wormwood.

    That's nice to hear. I was nervous about the cruise ship image. Generally I try to focus on something non-microscale in the foreground which lets the microscale stuff in the background look pleasingly blurry. Not sure what you didn't like so much about Wordwood, but as ever, I'm open to other suggestions for how to depict a giant star falling to Earth like a blazing torch. :)

    Thanks for the comments!

    -Brendan Powell Smith
    http://www.thebricktestament.com

    ReplyDelete
  2. Cool! Thanks for the extensive comments, Brendan. Just to point out, again, for readers, while Brendan and I have different religious perspectives, we've been corresponding about his work since it's genesis and I'm one of his biggest fans.

    Perhaps the major point of difference we have above is on the morality of a book that describes such harsh punishments. While I certainly understand your point, and share some unease at these, I also note that we're sitting in pretty comfortable situations. I don't know how quick I would be to condemn someone who stood up in a German concentration camp and said that judgement was coming and that all of the Nazis were going to be destroyed (I'm stepping back a bit from your example because I'm not sure what that brings to the table), or a slave in the antebellum South who stood up and said that all the white masters were going to be driven away, or someone under any dictator or totalitarian regime who called for their violent overthrow. Indeed, I'd probably call them brave. If we grant, for the moment, that apocolyptic literature was written to a people under such oppression, I think it has a similar impact.

    Have you ever run across the book The Sunflower? Simon Wiesenthal recounts his encounter with a dying Nazi who wanted forgiveness from a Jew for his crimes. Wiesenthal said nothing, either to condemn or comfort the dying man, but then after the Allies freed him from the concentration camp he was haunted by this event. He sought out responses from theologins, philosophers, etc., and the second half of the book is essays by these various people from many different traditions about the proper response. I understand that there is a newer version of the book that has added many more essays, including from the survivors of other genocides. I'd simply submit that the proper response of an oppressed people to their oppressors is not as cut and dried as you imply.

    BTW, the same discussion comes up with Psalms 137, one I can already imagine the illustration for. I'm looking forward to you illustrating the Psalms.

    Later down in your response you say: "one might charge that I "only highlight X percent of the Bible in an attempt to make it look bad" while my feeling is that everyone else "only highlights Y percent of the Bible to make it look good". But with 399 Bible stories and 4,302 illustrations so far, it is my hope that people are beginning to see that X is very large, growing, and will likely reach 90-95% while Y seems to stay around 5%."
    I'm happy to admit my own bias here, but I think you're overstating your case. I've pointed out before times where I think your picking and choosing distorts the original. For instance, when you first illustrated the story of the kid who fell out of the window while Paul was preaching, you cut off the last few lines in the story where there was a miraculous healing of the boy (to be fair, you went back later and added those lines).

    On the more LEGO critique, I don't really have any better suggestion for the four beasts and the lamb. I hope you don't take the things I dislike too much to heart - I just don't want to be a fanboy, gushing love over everything and therefore losing any claim to credibility. On Wormwood, how about some sort of cluster of connected flame pieces - maybe based around a spherical core so the flames are coming out in three dimensions rather than being a flat circle.

    Thanks for the extensive response, Brendan. I see that you've just posted new chapters, so I'll try and get those posted up with comments in the next few days.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The author of Revelation is not merely condemning his oppressors. If that were the case, it would indeed be analogous to your version of the concentration camp scenario or the slavery protester. The author of Revelation is condemning the ENTIRE WORLD to the most heinous tortures, man, woman, and child, and goes on to posit that it is a morally righteous thing that they will all suffer endless torture for eternity. Revelation is a book of paranoid, bloodthirsty wishful vengeance.

    It is one thing to pontificate on whether someone being oppressed is in the moral right to dwell on the torture of his perceived oppressors in order to bolster the spirits of the oppressed. It is quite another thing when such a piece of writing is accepted into the holy scriptures of a major religion where it is given the status of "word of God" and assumed to showcase the height of moral righteousness by its mere inclusion in the canon.

    > I'd simply submit that the proper response of an oppressed
    > people to their oppressors is not as cut and dried as you
    > imply.

    Oh, I concur. Nobody expects a human who is being oppressed to necessarily showcase high-minded righteousness in response. But I think people have every right to expect the height of morality to be showcased at every turn from a book that is supposed to be the word of God, and the purported proper basis of our moral value system.

    > BTW, the same discussion comes up with Psalms 137

    I will indeed have to devote some time to illustrating the Pslams, because I sense they have a "good reputation", but one I consider woefully undeserved. The Psalms are chock full of cries for vengeance against enemies. Is there really a discussion to be had about whether wishing your oppressors' babies get smashed against rocks is moral thinking worth emulating?

    ReplyDelete
  4. > I'm happy to admit my own bias here, but I think you're
    > overstating your case.

    I tend to think I'm conservative in stating my case. But from my perspective, all it ever takes to discredit something that is claimed to be the greatest moral authority is one instance of it not being so. Pointing out hundreds of instances is overkill, but I think it's important that people understand just how terrible a moral guide the Bible is.

    > I've pointed out before times where I think your picking
    > and choosing distorts the original. For instance, when you
    > first illustrated the story of the kid who fell out of the
    > window while Paul was preaching, you cut off the last few
    > lines in the story where there was a miraculous healing of
    > the boy

    I came to the Bible fully expecting it to live up to its reputation as the all-powerful, all-knowing, and all-loving God's message to humankind and as such that it would wow me at each verse with its undeniably high-minded morality and incredible wisdom. From that point of view, it is really NOT REMARKABLE AT ALL when Paul does something like bringing someone back to life. One would fully expect such actions from a Paul, a Jesus, a Moses, a Yahweh, etc. It's all the instances where these revered Biblical figures DON'T do such things when they could, or act in ways that are anywhere from morally ambiguous to morally reprehensible that I consider truly noteworthy.

    It's kind of like the Widow's Offering story from Mark 12:41-44, except that when you think about it, Jesus and Yahweh are condemned by the very moral of the story. Jesus and Yahweh have an infinite amount of power and wealth with which to alleviate suffering and bring people joy, but their actions (as recorded in the Bible) show them to be far more stingy with it than the rich people of the Widow's Offering story. They do an impossibly small fraction of the good they could potentially do. And worse, they do morally terrible things as well, and therefore can be held all the more accountable for it. As I understand the moral of this story, when a mere human, as comparatively massively limited in our capacities as we are, does something morally good, it outshines anything Jesus or God has ever done.

    ReplyDelete